Statutory reference on excise duty, Rule 56-C permission, exemption claim, and penalty was sent to the High Court.

Questions of law concerning liability to excise duty, the effect of permission under Rule 56-C, claimed exemption under Notification No. 105/80, and penalty were treated as arising from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal held that the later questions were consequential to the core controversy and found the formulated issues fit for reference under the statutory reference provision. The questions of law were therefore referred to the High Court for decision, leaving the substantive excise liability issues to be determined there.

---

---

Issues: Whether the questions of law arising from the Tribunal's order should be referred to the High Court.

Analysis: The application sought reference of questions concerning liability to duty, the effect of permission under Rule 56-C, the claimed exemption under Notification No. 105/80, and the penalty. The order concluded that questions (iii) and (iv) were consequential to the first two and that the formulated questions were fit to be referred under the statutory reference provision.

Conclusion: The questions of law were referred to the High Court for decision.

Final Conclusion: The proceeding ended with a statutory reference, leaving the substantive excise liability issues to be determined by the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the questions raised are consequential to the core controversy, the Tribunal may formulate and refer the substantive questions of law arising from its order under the reference provision.

---