Customs duty refund for alleged short-shipment failed without contemporaneous import evidence and supporting shipment documents.

Refund of customs duty for alleged short-shipped goods was denied because the importer failed to produce contemporaneous evidence showing what had actually been shipped and cleared. The Tribunal noted that the goods were already cleared from customs charge, the shortage was detected only at the consignee's premises, and no supporting import documents, no-charge invoice, packing specifications, or other particulars corroborated short-shipment. Subsequent free supply by the foreign supplier was held insufficient to establish the shortage or justify refund, and the claim did not fit the refund provisions relied upon.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund of customs duty on alleged short-shipped goods was admissible in the absence of contemporaneous evidence and supporting import documents.

Analysis: The claim was based on the assertion that, after clearance, certain items were found missing and were later supplied free of charge by the foreign supplier. The Tribunal noted that the goods had been physically cleared out of customs charge, the alleged shortage was noticed only at the consignee's premises, and there were no contemporaneous documents such as a no-charge invoice, customs-attested invoice, packing specifications, or other particulars to establish what had actually been shipped. In these circumstances, the subsequent supply of goods by the supplier was held insufficient to prove short-shipment or to justify refund of duty. The claim was also found not to fall under the refund-related provisions relied upon.

Conclusion: The refund claim was not established and was rejected.

---