TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the assessee's additional ground, raising the question of total disruption of the Hindu undivided family and the existence of an assessable entity, was admissible; (ii) whether the orders of the lower authorities were liable to be set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration, including valuation, with opportunity to the assessee to raise objections.
Issue (i): whether the assessee's additional ground, raising the question of total disruption of the Hindu undivided family and the existence of an assessable entity, was admissible.
Analysis: The additional ground was treated as going to the root of the matter because it directly affected whether the tax assessment could stand in the hands of the family as a unit. Being a pure question of law relevant to the foundational issue of assessability, it was admitted.
Conclusion: The additional ground was admitted.
Issue (ii): whether the orders of the lower authorities were liable to be set aside and the matter restored for fresh consideration, including valuation, with opportunity to the assessee to raise objections.
Analysis: The question whether there was a total disruption of the family and whether any assessable entity survived had not been examined by the Wealth-tax Officer. The proper course was to set aside the orders and remit the matter for a fresh decision after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The valuation dispute was also left open to be examined afresh if an assessable entity was found to exist.
Conclusion: The orders were set aside and the matter was restored to the Wealth-tax Officer for de novo consideration.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded to the extent of obtaining admission of the additional ground and a remand for fresh adjudication on assessability and valuation, while the Department's cross objections did not survive the remand.
Ratio Decidendi: A legal ground that goes to the root of assessability may be admitted at the appellate stage, and where the foundational question of the existence of an assessable entity has not been examined, the proper course is to set aside the assessment and remit the matter for fresh consideration after hearing the assessee.
TaxTMI 
