Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 18(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act was exigible for delay in filing the wealth-tax return where the assessee's capital position in partnership firms was not ascertainable when the return became due.
Analysis: The delay was found to have arisen because the assessee's major wealth consisted of capital in two firms and the firms' accounts had not been finalised by the due date, so the capital account position could not be ascertained for filing the return. On these facts, the delay was treated as properly explained by reasonable cause. The absence of a formal petition did not detract from the explanation accepted on the record.
Conclusion: The penalty was not sustainable and its cancellation was upheld.