Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the profits and gains from sales to the Government of India were received by the assessee in the taxable territories when payment was made by cheques received at Jaipur and later realised at Bombay.
Analysis: The decisive question was the place of receipt of payment. The payments were made by cheques drawn on the Reserve Bank of India at Bombay and received by the assessee at Jaipur. There was no finding that the cheques were sent by post at the assessee's request or with its implied authority, and the revenue did not prove that fact. The court treated payment by cheque, on the facts of the contract and the conduct of the parties, as equivalent to cash and held that the Government had discharged its liability when the cheques were delivered at Jaipur. The subsequent realisation of the cheques at Bombay did not shift the place of receipt. The burden remained on the revenue to prove receipt within the taxable territories, and that burden was not discharged.
Conclusion: The profits and gains in respect of the sales to the Government of India were not received in the taxable territories and were received by the assessee outside those territories.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the amounts in question were held not to be taxable as receipts within the taxable territories.
Ratio Decidendi: Where payment by cheque is made and received in discharge of the debt at the creditor's place, and there is no proof of authority or agreement to treat postal transmission or later encashment elsewhere as the place of receipt, the receipt occurs where the cheque is delivered, not where it is subsequently realised.