Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the question referred by the Tribunal arose out of its order so as to sustain a valid reference under section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The Tribunal had not been asked to decide whether it possessed power to alter the valuers' figure, nor had it dealt with that question in its order. The issue referred was therefore one neither raised before nor considered by the Tribunal. The words used in section 26(1) of the Gift-tax Act were construed in the same manner as the corresponding words in the income-tax reference provision, so that only a question raised before or decided by the Tribunal can be said to arise out of its order.
Conclusion: The reference was incompetent because the referred question did not arise out of the Tribunal's order.