Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1984 (2) TMI 202 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal cancels income tax orders for undistributed income citing reasonable cause and permissible deductions. The Tribunal allowed both appeals, canceling the ITO's orders levying additional income-tax on undistributed income for the assessment years 1977-78 and ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal cancels income tax orders for undistributed income citing reasonable cause and permissible deductions.

                            The Tribunal allowed both appeals, canceling the ITO's orders levying additional income-tax on undistributed income for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. The Tribunal held that the assessee had reasonable cause for the delay in declaring dividends and that the deductions claimed in the computation of distributable income were permissible. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of additional income-tax was unwarranted given the circumstances and the genuine efforts made by the assessee to finalize accounts and declare dividends.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Legality of imposing additional income-tax under section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Validity of dividend declarations made after the prescribed period.
                            3. Computation of distributable income.
                            4. Reasonableness of failure to declare dividends within twelve months.
                            5. Determination of the assessee as an industrial company.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Legality of Imposing Additional Income-Tax under Section 104:

                            The core issue is whether the Income-tax Officer (ITO) was justified in levying additional income-tax under section 104 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee argued that the provision is penal in nature and should not apply if dividends were declared before the date of the order under section 104. The Tribunal noted that the assessee declared dividends before the assessment orders were passed but after the prescribed twelve-month period. The Tribunal referenced the Supreme Court decision in CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., which held that no penalty can be imposed unless tax remains outstanding on the penalty day.

                            2. Validity of Dividend Declarations Made After the Prescribed Period:

                            The assessee contended that dividends declared after the twelve-month period but before the ITO's order should be considered valid, citing CIT v. Dedia Agency (P.) Ltd. and ITO v. Sawhney Trading Co. (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal found that the assessee had reasonable and sufficient cause for the delay, primarily due to difficulties in finalizing accounts, and thus, the late declarations should be treated as valid.

                            3. Computation of Distributable Income:

                            The Tribunal scrutinized the ITO's computation of distributable income for both assessment years. The assessee argued for additional deductions, including statutory reserves, bad and doubtful debts, and gratuity, which the ITO had disallowed. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, noting that these deductions are permissible under section 109(i)(g)(4) of the Act. For the assessment year 1977-78, the distributable income was recalculated to Rs. 18,079, and for 1978-79, to Rs. 2,63,781, significantly lower than the ITO's figures.

                            4. Reasonableness of Failure to Declare Dividends within Twelve Months:

                            The Tribunal examined whether the assessee's failure to declare dividends within the twelve-month period was reasonable. It noted the genuine and bona fide difficulties in finalizing accounts due to the numerous branches and voluminous work. The Tribunal found that the delay was not due to any mala fides or intent to avoid dividend distribution. The Tribunal concluded that the failure was for good and sufficient reasons, and thus, the period should be extended.

                            5. Determination of the Assessee as an Industrial Company:

                            While the assessee also contested its classification as an industrial company, the Tribunal decided not to address this issue as it was not necessary for the disposal of the appeals.

                            Conclusion:

                            The Tribunal allowed both appeals, canceling the ITO's orders levying additional income-tax on undistributed income for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79. The Tribunal held that the assessee had reasonable cause for the delay in declaring dividends and that the deductions claimed in the computation of distributable income were permissible. The Tribunal emphasized that the imposition of additional income-tax was unwarranted given the circumstances and the genuine efforts made by the assessee to finalize accounts and declare dividends.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found