Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of property for a stated price, coupled with retained rights of reconveyance and first option/pre-emption, involved inadequacy of consideration so as to attract gift-tax under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The sale deed showed that the stated price was only one part of the bargain and that the transferors retained valuable contractual rights to repurchase the property after 25 years and to insist on the first option if the purchaser resold within that period. These retained rights formed part of the real consideration and could not be ignored merely because the registering authority had adopted a higher guideline value or because stamp duty had been paid on that value. The proper inquiry was whether the transaction was bona fide and whether the consideration was reasonable and adequate, not whether the apparent price matched an independently estimated market value. On the facts, the consideration could not be said to be inadequate.
Conclusion: Section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act was not attracted, and the gift-tax assessments were liable to be cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of gift-tax, where a transfer is made for a stated price together with valuable retained rights forming part of the bargain, adequacy of consideration must be judged by the bona fides and total consideration of the transaction, and not by market value alone.