Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the commission paid to the assessee's agent in Japan for securing coal supply contracts was allowable as a deduction under section 10(2)(xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The commission was paid in connection with obtaining sales orders in the ordinary course of the assessee's coal business. The Tribunal's finding that the rate of commission was in accord with normal commercial practice was accepted. The expenditure did not secure any monopoly right, exclusive privilege, or other enduring advantage. The amount of expenditure and the fact that the assessee entered a new market did not change its character, because the payment remained incidental to the trading operations and formed part of the profit-earning process. The authorities relied on by the revenue were distinguished as involving enduring assets, monopoly rights, or concessions of a different kind.
Conclusion: The commission expenditure was a revenue outgoing allowable as a deduction, and the question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for securing sales in the ordinary course of business, without obtaining any enduring advantage, is allowable as revenue expenditure even if paid at a high rate in a new market.