2018 (8) TMI 1127 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT overturns disallowance of commission expenditure, emphasizing documentation and necessity for business.

Farm Services Indore Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5 (1), Indore

Farm Services Indore Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 5 (1), Indore - TMI Issues Involved:1. Disallowance of commission expenditure of Rs. 27.92 lakhs.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Disallowance of Commission Expenditure of Rs. 27.92 Lakhs:The primary issue pertains to the disallowance of commission expenditure amounting to Rs. 27.92 lakhs by the Assessing Officer (AO). The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in trading bio-pesticides and other agricultural inputs, had claimed commission expenses of Rs. 58.62 lakhs in its Profit & Loss account. The AO, upon scrutiny, disallowed the entire commission expenditure, questioning its genuineness based on information from government nodal agencies which indicated that no agent services were required by them. Consequently, the AO added the disallowed amount back to the assessee's income, resulting in an assessed income of Rs. 77,84,995.Appeal to CIT(A):The assessee appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], who partly allowed the appeal. The CIT(A) accepted the genuineness of the commission expenditure but deemed the claimed amount excessive. Consequently, the CIT(A) restricted the allowable commission expenditure to 4% of the turnover, providing relief of Rs. 30.70 lakhs and sustaining the disallowance of the remaining Rs. 27.92 lakhs.Appeal to ITAT:The assessee further appealed to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), challenging the disallowance of Rs. 27.92 lakhs. The assessee argued that the CIT(A) had acknowledged the genuineness of the expenditure and the business expediency but unjustifiably restricted the commission expenditure. The assessee emphasized that the increased sales were a result of the efforts of the commission agents and that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes.Tribunal's Findings:The ITAT examined the facts and submissions, noting that the assessee's turnover had significantly increased due to the efforts of the commission agents. The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) had accepted the necessity of the commission expenditure but had restricted it based on the percentage of turnover in previous years, which was not a justified approach. The ITAT found that the commission expenditure was incurred for promoting sales, which resulted in a threefold increase in turnover. The Tribunal also noted that the payments were made through account payee cheques with proper documentation and TDS deductions, establishing the genuineness of the transactions.Judicial Precedents:The ITAT referred to several judicial precedents, including the decisions of ITAT Delhi in Bony Rubber Co. (P) Ltd and the jurisdictional High Court in PCIT Vs Satish Jain, which supported the assessee's claim that the AO cannot disallow genuine business expenditure based on their subjective judgment of necessity.Conclusion:The ITAT concluded that the AO was not justified in disallowing the commission expenditure of Rs. 58.62 lakhs. The Tribunal set aside the findings of the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 27.92 lakhs. The ITAT emphasized that the expenditure was incurred wholly and exclusively for business purposes, resulting in increased sales, and the genuineness of the commission payments was established with sufficient documentary evidence.Result:The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the disallowance of Rs. 27.92 lakhs, and pronounced the order in the open court on 31.7.2018.