Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether weighted deduction under section 35B was admissible on current charges incurred for running the freezing plant. (ii) Whether weighted deduction was admissible on quality control inspection expenses and export credit guarantee commission. (iii) Whether weighted deduction on telephone, telex, salary and bonus expenses was to be allowed in full or only partly as common export-related expenditure.
Issue (i): Whether weighted deduction under section 35B was admissible on current charges incurred for running the freezing plant.
Analysis: The outlay on electricity/current charges was treated as expenditure forming part of the cost of making the goods marketable and as expenditure in India connected with distribution, supply or provision of goods, attracting the exclusion under section 35B(1)(b)(iii).
Conclusion: Weighted deduction on current charges was disallowed and the refusal of relief was upheld.
Issue (ii): Whether weighted deduction was admissible on quality control inspection expenses and export credit guarantee commission.
Analysis: These items were held to fall within the category of expenditure eligible for export incentive weightage, following the view already taken in the Full Bench decision referred to in the order.
Conclusion: Weighted deduction was allowed on both quality control inspection expenses and export credit guarantee commission.
Issue (iii): Whether weighted deduction on telephone, telex, salary and bonus expenses was to be allowed in full or only partly as common export-related expenditure.
Analysis: Telephone expenses, telex charges, salary and bonus were treated as common expenses, part of which related to purchases and processing rather than exclusively to export effort. The deductible portion was therefore restricted to a reasonable apportionment.
Conclusion: Weighted deduction was allowed only to the extent of 50 per cent of the common expenses, with relief on telex charges, resulting in a higher allowance than that granted by the assessing authority.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with relief granted on some export-related items and partial allowance on common expenses, while the claim on current charges remained disallowed.
Ratio Decidendi: For weighted deduction under section 35B, expenditure directly referable to export promotion qualifies, but common overheads must be reasonably apportioned and expenditure forming part of the cost of production or distribution is excluded.