Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the debt claimed against the estate was liable to be scaled down under section 46 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 on the ground that the creditor had earlier received property gifted by the deceased.
Analysis: Section 44 permits deduction of debts incurred bona fide and for full consideration, while section 46 restricts the deduction where the consideration for the debt consists of property derived from the deceased, or where the lender's resources at any time included such property. The decisive requirement is a real connection between the gifted property and the debt sought to be deducted. On the facts, the gifted amount had been withdrawn and there was no direct nexus between that gift and the later loan transactions reflected in the running account. The creditor also had independent funds and the later advances were not shown to have been made with reference to or with a view to facilitating the debt.
Conclusion: The provisions of section 46 did not apply, and the deduction could not be scaled down.