Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the air ticket expenses incurred for two cine artistes to attend the Tashkent Film Festival were allowable as expenditure laid out wholly and exclusively for the business purposes of the assessee.
Analysis: The assessee was a film producer and the films produced by it were shown at the festival. The attendance of artistes at a prestigious international film event was treated as connected with the exploitation and enhancement of the value of the films. The existence of an invitation in respect of one artiste, and the finding that a similar invitation was sent to the other, supported the business nexus of the expenditure. The expenditure was therefore regarded as commercially expedient and incurred in the course of the assessee's business.
Conclusion: The expenditure was allowable as business expenditure and the disallowance was rightly deleted. The appeal failed.