Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 99 lakhs received by the assessee was a capital receipt on surrender of tenancy rights or was consideration for assignment/transfer of tenancy rights giving rise to taxable long-term capital gains.
Analysis: The receipt arose from an arrangement in which the assessee cooperated in enabling the transfer of tenancy-related rights to a third tenant, and the consideration was split between the assessee and the first lessee as part of the same transaction. The substance of the arrangement, rather than the terminology used in the documents, showed that the assessee did not merely surrender tenancy to the owner. The assessee's rights in the leasehold property were relinquished in favour of another tenant for consideration, which fell within the definition of transfer of a capital asset. A leasehold interest is a capital asset, and transfer of such rights by assignment for consideration results in taxable capital gains. The reliance placed on authorities dealing with simple surrender of tenancy rights was not applicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 99 lakhs was not a non-taxable surrender receipt. It was consideration for transfer of a capital asset and was taxable as long-term capital gains, against the assessee.