Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the loan advanced by the company to the shareholder was exempt from deemed-dividend treatment under section 2(6A)(e) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 because the lending of money formed a substantial part of the company's business and the advance was made in the ordinary course of that business.
Analysis: The record showed that the company had repeatedly advanced money in several assessment years, had received interest on such advances, and its assessments for earlier years treated the interest as business income. The company's business profile also changed over time, with the factory operations closing and the proceeds being deployed in lending activities. On this material, the advance in question was found to have been made as part of the company's money-lending business rather than as a dividend distribution disguised as a loan. The request to rely on a belated affidavit was declined, but the existing record was held sufficient to decide the issue.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the exclusion in section 2(6A)(e), and the amount of Rs. 52,617 could not be assessed as deemed dividend.
Final Conclusion: The addition made on the footing of deemed dividend was deleted and the assessee succeeded in the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: A shareholder's loan is excluded from deemed-dividend treatment where the company proves that money-lending is a substantial part of its business and the advance was made in the ordinary course of that business.