1988 (7) TMI 127 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT directs WTO to assess per CIT(A) directions, emphasizing legal procedures in tax disputes

SVR. VEERAPPAN CHETTIAR. Versus WEALTH TAX OFFICER.

The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directed the WTO to complete the assessment as per the CIT(A)'s directions without being influenced by the ... - Issues:1. Recognition of partial partition in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment year 1979-80.2. Validity of the assessing officer's order under section 171 of the Income Tax Act.3. Interpretation of the amendment to section 171 regarding partition in HUFs.4. Jurisdiction of the CIT(A) in expressing opinions during pendency of a writ petition challenging the validity of a tax provision.Analysis:1. The case involved a dispute regarding the recognition of a partial partition in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment year 1979-80. The assessing officer had assessed the entire wealth of the bigger HUF without recognizing the partition, leading to an appeal by the assessee before the CIT(A).2. The CIT(A) pointed out that a High Court order had granted interim stay on the proceedings related to the assessing officer's order. The CIT(A) set aside the assessing officer's order to allow for completion of assessment in accordance with law after receiving the final orders of the High Court in the pending writ petition challenging the validity of the tax provision.3. The CIT(A) directed the Wealth Tax Officer (WTO) to adopt the value of the property as per the Tribunal's order for the previous assessment year. The CIT(A) held that the partition could not be recognized for the assessment year 1979-80, and the assessment of the bigger HUF should continue unless the assessee succeeded in the High Court.4. The assessee appealed before the ITAT, arguing that the CIT(A) erred in not recognizing the partial partition and cited relevant court decisions to support their claim. The ITAT agreed with the assessee, stating that the CIT(A) should not have expressed an opinion on the issue while a writ petition challenging the tax provision was pending. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s finding and directed the WTO to complete the assessment as per the CIT(A)'s directions without being influenced by the earlier opinion expressed by the CIT(A).This judgment highlights the significance of legal procedures and the impact of pending litigation on tax assessments, emphasizing the need for adherence to legal principles and the importance of judicial decisions in resolving disputes related to tax matters.