TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Case on Capital Gains & Property Valuation: Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee</h1> <h3>Mrs. Indira Bai. Versus Income-Tax Officer.</h3> Mrs. Indira Bai. Versus Income-Tax Officer. - ITD 042, 397, Issues:1. Computation of capital gains from the sale of a house property.2. Determination of fair market value of the property as on 1-1-1964 for tax purposes.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: The appeal pertained to the computation of capital gains from the sale of a house property by an individual. The initial assessment did not admit any capital gains as the assessee deducted the cost of the property from the sale value, claiming reinvestment in a new property and other investments. However, the Commissioner set aside the order for a fresh assessment, leading to a dispute over the apportionment of sale proceeds between house building and vacant land for tax purposes.Issue 2: The main contention revolved around the determination of the fair market value of the property as on 1-1-1964 for tax purposes. The assessee argued for a higher value based on the sale of an adjacent property, while the revenue relied on the value returned for wealth-tax purposes. The Tribunal rejected the revenue's contention that the value returned for wealth-tax purposes should be conclusive for capital gains computation, emphasizing that such values are opinions and not admissions. The Tribunal held that the value for wealth-tax purposes was routine and not based on specific evidence, allowing the assessee to challenge it with additional data, such as the sale deed of an adjacent property, to determine a more accurate market value for capital gains computation.The Tribunal cited legal precedents to support its decision, highlighting that values for different tax purposes may vary based on the purpose and approach of each tax law. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a more accurate determination of market value for capital gains, considering the one-time nature of the tax and the importance of a fair assessment. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the computation of capital gains based on the assessee's claimed value of Rs. 3 lakhs as on 1-1-1964.
TaxTMI 