Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and on the assumption that the later partnership deed was genuine, the assessee's entire 47.25 pies share in the registered firm was includible in his total income or only his real share therein.
Analysis: The relevant assessment was governed by the Income-tax Act, 1922. On the assumed genuineness of the later deed, the persons named therein were the owners of the 47.25 pies share itself, so the income from that share was first earned by all of them in the proportions stated in the deed. The case therefore involved diversion of income at source, not merely an arrangement by which the assessee applied his own income in a particular manner. The principle of real income applied, and the authorities treating every registered-firm share as necessarily the assessee's income were not accepted on these facts.
Conclusion: The entire sum of Rs. 1,34,944 was not includible in the assessee's total income; only his proportionate share of that income was taxable, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a genuine sub-partnership or similar arrangement makes others co-owners of the share itself in a registered firm, the income from that share is taxable only to the extent it represents the assessee's real income and is not fully assessable in his hands merely because the share stands in his name.