Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty under section 10A of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 could be sustained when the goods purchased were included in the registration certificate and were used in the manufacture of the dealer's finished products.
Analysis: The goods purchased were found to be covered by the registration certificate, and the issue of 'C' forms was therefore in order. The statutory scheme under section 8(3)(b) and rule 13 treated goods intended for use as raw materials, processing materials, machinery, plant, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, fuel or lubricating materials in manufacture as eligible purchases. The notification issued under section 8(3)(b) was also relied on as supporting the inclusive and non-exhaustive character of the list. On that footing, the characterisation of the goods as capital goods did not defeat their inclusion within the manufacturing process for the purposes of the Act and Rules.
Conclusion: The penalty under section 10A was not sustainable, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are covered by the registration certificate and fall within the statutory and notified categories of goods used in manufacture, penalty cannot be sustained merely because the goods are described as capital goods.