Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the trustee under the trust deed dated 19 July 1949 was assessable to wealth-tax under section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act for the relevant assessment years.
Analysis: Section 21 applies where chargeable assets are held by a trustee on behalf of another person, and the assessment in such a case is representative in character and co-extensive with the liability of the person on whose behalf the assets are held. The trust property in question was held by the trustee as legal owner for the benefit of the beneficiaries, and the expression "on behalf of" was held to be materially different from "for the benefit of". On the relevant valuation dates, the trustee did not hold the trust estate on behalf of the two sons so as to attract section 21. The charging provision in section 3 also could not support a representative assessment because the beneficiaries themselves were not liable in respect of the trust corpus in the manner required by section 21.
Conclusion: The trustee was not assessable to wealth-tax under section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act. The question was answered in the negative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A trustee who holds trust property for the benefit of beneficiaries, but not on their behalf, does not fall within section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act, and representative wealth-tax assessment cannot be made unless the statutory condition of holding assets on behalf of another is satisfied.