Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2002 (11) TMI 276 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Tribunal: Appeal partially allowed, additions based on loose sheets deleted, interest relief granted The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of Shri J.R.C. Bhandari, deleting additions based on loose sheets and directing relief for interest u/s 234B. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tax Tribunal: Appeal partially allowed, additions based on loose sheets deleted, interest relief granted

                          The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals of Shri J.R.C. Bhandari, deleting additions based on loose sheets and directing relief for interest u/s 234B. The Revenue's appeal against Shri Swaroop Chand Sethi was dismissed, upholding the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,50,000. Additionally, the Tribunal sustained the addition of Rs. 25,000 in the assessee's case, dismissing the cross-objection.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Addition of Rs. 1,94,100 in each of the five assessment years for assessee Shri J.R.C. Bhandari.
                          2. Validity of initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 148.
                          3. Charging of interest u/s 234B.
                          4. Deletion of addition of Rs. 3,50,000 for assessee Shri Swaroop Chand Sethi.
                          5. Sustenance of addition of Rs. 25,000 in assessee's C.O. No. 112/Jdpr/1999.

                          Summary:

                          1. Addition of Rs. 1,94,100 in each of the five assessment years for assessee Shri J.R.C. Bhandari:
                          The Tribunal addressed the appeals of Shri J.R.C. Bhandari concerning the addition of Rs. 1,94,100 for assessment years 1990-91 to 1994-95. The addition was based on a loose sheet (A-1/71) found during a search at the residence of a third party, Shri A.K. Chajjer, which allegedly indicated additional payments to employees. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof lay on the Department to substantiate the entries with positive evidence. Citing various precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in CBI vs. V.C. Shukla, the Tribunal held that loose sheets without corroborative evidence could not justify the addition. Consequently, the additions were deleted.

                          2. Validity of initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 148:
                          Ground No. 4 in ITA Nos. 196 to 198/Del/2002, disputing the validity of reassessment proceedings u/s 148, was not pressed by the assessee's representative during arguments and was dismissed accordingly.

                          3. Charging of interest u/s 234B:
                          Ground No. 5 in ITA Nos. 196 to 198/Del/2002 and Ground No. 4 in ITA Nos. 199 and 200/Del/2002 disputed the charging of interest u/s 234B. The Tribunal directed the AO to accord consequential relief to the assessee regarding the charging of interest.

                          4. Deletion of addition of Rs. 3,50,000 for assessee Shri Swaroop Chand Sethi:
                          The Tribunal considered the appeal by the Revenue against the deletion of an addition of Rs. 3,50,000 made by the AO on account of alleged additional payments over salary. The Tribunal found the case identical to that of Shri J.R.C. Bhandari and upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the addition, reiterating that no liability could be fastened based on loose sheets found from a third party without corroborative evidence.

                          5. Sustenance of addition of Rs. 25,000 in assessee's C.O. No. 112/Jdpr/1999:
                          The Tribunal addressed the cross-objection by the assessee disputing the sustenance of an addition of Rs. 25,000. The addition was made as unexplained cash found during a search, which the assessee claimed belonged to his wife. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order sustaining the addition, as the cash was not shown in the wife's balance sheet in the previous year's return. The cross-objection was dismissed.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeals of Shri J.R.C. Bhandari in part, deleted the additions based on loose sheets, and directed consequential relief for interest u/s 234B. The Revenue's appeal against Shri Swaroop Chand Sethi was dismissed, and the assessee's cross-objection was also dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found