Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excise duty liabilities arising from the withdrawal of wrongly granted proforma credit under the Central Excise Rules, 1944 were allowable as a deduction in the year in which the demand was raised.
Analysis: Rule 56A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 governed the grant and adjustment of proforma credit on duty-paid inputs used in the manufacture of finished excisable goods. The record showed that credit had been initially allowed and had reduced the duty actually recovered from the assessee. When the Excise Authorities later discovered the mistake and issued a fresh demand, the liability became fastened in that year. The deduction was therefore linked to the year of demand and not to the earlier period to which the underlying duty related.
Conclusion: The liability was held allowable as a deduction in the year under review, and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory excise liability is freshly demanded in a later year on discovery that proforma credit was wrongly granted, the liability accrues in the year of demand and is deductible in computing income for that year.