Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be levied when no penalty proceedings were initiated at the stage of assessment under section 143(1) and the assessment was later reopened and completed under section 143(3).
Analysis: The return was filed beyond the due date and penalty was imposed for delayed filing. However, no penalty proceedings were initiated when the assessment was first completed under section 143(1). On the facts, this omission was treated as an implied waiver of penal action. Once such waiver was inferred, there was no justification for initiating penalty proceedings at the later stage of assessment under section 143(3).
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(a) was not sustainable and was cancelled.