Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the profit arising from purchase and sale transactions carried on by the minor through his father and guardian could be assessed in the hands of the firm.
Analysis: The finding recorded was that the transactions were effected by the father on behalf of the minor, who had sufficient funds with the firm and in whose account the income was credited. The Revenue failed to place any material to show that the firm itself undertook the transactions or enjoyed the profit. On these facts, the guardian was competent to act on behalf of the minor, and the addition in the firm's hands was not justified.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 6,053 in the hands of the firm was not sustainable and was rightly deleted.