Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by a firm to the Hindu undivided families of partners, who had joined the firm in their individual capacity, was liable to be disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 40(b) applies to interest paid to a partner of the firm. The partners concerned had joined the firm individually, and the interest paid in their individual accounts had already been brought within the mischief of the provision. The interest paid in the separate accounts of their Hindu undivided families stood on a different footing, because the Hindu undivided family is a distinct entity and is not the same as a partner who enters the firm in an individual capacity. The reasoned view supporting this distinction was accepted, and the contrary reliance placed by the Revenue on authority dealing with representative capacity was treated as inapplicable.
Conclusion: Interest paid to the Hindu undivided families was not disallowable under section 40(b), and the deletion of the addition was upheld in favour of the assessee.