Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts settled by the Karta of a Hindu undivided family on his daughters under the family settlement deed constituted taxable gifts under the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Analysis: The settlement deed had to be read as a whole to ascertain the intention of the executant. The amounts allotted to the unmarried daughters were earmarked for their maintenance, education, marriage expenses and other needs, and therefore did not answer the definition of a gift. The sums of Rs. 5,000 each settled on the two married daughters were described as their share, and were treated as transfers in lieu of their entitlement rather than gratuitous gifts. Even on the assumption that those sums could be treated as gifts, the only taxable gift in the relevant year did not exceed the basic exemption available under the Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Conclusion: The amounts settled on the daughters were not taxable gifts, and no gift-tax was chargeable on the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessment could not be sustained because the family settlement did not give rise to any taxable gift within the relevant exemption limits.
Ratio Decidendi: A family settlement made by a Karta for daughters' maintenance, marriage and shares in family property is not a gift where the transfer is referable to a legal or family obligation and not to a gratuitous disposition.