Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subsidy received by the assessee under the State Investment Subsidy Scheme was a capital receipt or a revenue receipt.
Analysis: The character of subsidy depends on its purpose. A subsidy granted to assist carrying on business operations after commencement of production is ordinarily a revenue receipt, but where the subsidy is intended to encourage setting up of industry and is linked to fixed capital investment, it takes the character of a capital receipt. The scheme in question computed subsidy with reference to fixed capital investment, excluded working capital, and required the industrial unit to continue in production for a stipulated period, showing that the payment was meant to induce establishment of industry in a backward area. The fact that the sanction was finalized after commencement of production did not alter the purpose of the subsidy.
Conclusion: The subsidy was a capital receipt and not taxable as revenue receipt.
Ratio Decidendi: The true character of a subsidy is determined by its purpose and not by the source of funds or the timing of sanction alone; if the subsidy is intended to promote setting up of an industry and is linked to fixed capital investment, it is a capital receipt.