Block assessment addition fails where construction was already disclosed and seized bills were accounted documents.

In a block assessment, an addition based on a DVO valuation report and seized marble bills was held unsustainable where the house construction expenditure had already been disclosed in the books and considered in regular assessments. The valuation report, by itself, was not treated as material found during search to support block assessment taxation of undisclosed income. The seized bills were regarded as accounted documents already taken into account by the assessing authority, so they could not be used again as a basis for treating the expenditure as undisclosed. The relief granted by the first appellate authority was therefore upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made in block assessment on the basis of the DVO report and seized marble bills could survive when the construction expenditure had already been disclosed and considered in regular assessment.

Analysis: The transactions relating to investment in the house construction had already been recorded in the books and were part of the earlier years' regular assessments. The valuation report of the DVO, by itself, was not material found during the course of search so as to justify a block assessment addition. The seized bills were treated as accounted documents and had already been taken into account by the assessing authority, leaving no basis to treat the expenditure as undisclosed income.

Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was upheld.

---