Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of the property was otherwise than for adequate consideration so as to attract deemed gift taxation under section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act.
Analysis: The Revenue relied on the stamp duty valuation fixed by the registration authorities, but no material was brought on record to show how that value represented the true market value of the property on the date of transfer. The assessing authority had not independently investigated whether the consideration was inadequate, whether the transaction was bona fide, or whether there was any attempt at tax evasion. The legal position applied was that adequate consideration is not to be judged merely by an external valuation and that the burden lies on the Revenue to establish inadequacy before invoking the deemed gift provision.
Conclusion: The transfer could not be treated as one made without adequate consideration, and no deemed gift was taxable in the hands of the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: For invoking section 4(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, the Revenue must prove that the property was transferred for inadequate consideration on the basis of a fair and proper enquiry; a mere stamp duty valuation, without supporting material, is insufficient.