Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under section 11 could be denied merely for want of a formal trust deed, and whether the income from the property was required to be examined for actual application to religious or charitable purposes.
Analysis: The entitlement to exemption depended on the intention behind the dedication of the property and not merely on the existence of an express deed. Where the trust is not formally documented, the surrounding circumstances, the stated exclusion of the property from partition, and the long actual use of the property for religious purposes were relevant factors. The revenue authorities had not properly examined these materials. At the same time, under section 11 only such income from property held under trust is exempt as is applied to religious or charitable purposes, so the actual utilization of the income still required verification.
Conclusion: Denial of exemption solely for absence of a formal trust deed was not justified, but the matter had to be sent back for examination of actual application of the income before relief could be granted.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption of income from property claimed to be held under trust, the existence of a formal deed is not ative if the dedication and charitable or religious use are otherwise established, but exemption ultimately depends on the actual application of the income to the permitted objects.