Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether each self-contained flat in a building could be treated as a separate residential unit for the purposes of the deduction under the second proviso to section 23(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The building consisted of six distinct apartments let out to different tenants for residential occupation. The presence of common amenities such as a single entrance, common passage, municipal tap connection, and a common electricity arrangement did not destroy the independent character of each apartment, as each unit provided complete residential accommodation to the occupants. A lodge-type use was distinguished from family residence in separate apartments. The statutory expression contemplated a building comprising one or more residential units, and the factual position showed six such units.
Conclusion: Each apartment was a separate residential unit, and the assessee was entitled to the deduction in respect of each unit.
Final Conclusion: The disallowance was set aside and the assessee succeeded on the claim under the second proviso to section 23(1).
Ratio Decidendi: Common facilities in a building do not negate the independent existence of self-contained residential apartments let out for family residence, and such units may each be treated as separate residential units for the statutory deduction.