Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court remained maintainable after the commencement of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of a reference pending on that date and decided thereafter under the repealed 1922 Act.
Analysis: Section 297(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 saved pending proceedings and required them to be continued and disposed of as if the 1961 Act had not been passed. The pending reference was therefore treated as part of the old statutory proceedings, and the subsequent appeal to the Supreme Court, together with the application for leave to appeal, was regarded as a continuation of that reference. Independently, the right of appeal available under section 66A(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 was a right accrued before repeal and was preserved by section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, there being no clear contrary intention in the 1961 Act. The Income-tax (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1962 was also read as consistent with that saving.
Conclusion: The application for leave to appeal was maintainable and the certificate was rightly granted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a pending income-tax reference is saved by the repealing statute, the right and procedure for pursuing a Supreme Court appeal arising out of that reference continue under the repealed law, and the accrued right of appeal is preserved unless a contrary legislative intention is clearly expressed.