Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order under section 171(3) recognising a partial partition is binding in proceedings under the Estate Duty Act, and whether the reopening of the estate duty assessment under section 59(b) could validly proceed by disregarding that order.
Analysis: The inquiry under section 171 of the Income-tax Act is a quasi-judicial inquiry, and once the Income-tax Officer records a finding under section 171(3) as to the existence and date of a total or partial partition, that order has operative force unless it is upset, vacated, cancelled, or reversed by a competent authority in accordance with law. The record disclosed no such setting aside of the order recognising the partial partition. The Tribunal held that such an order cannot be ignored by another authority merely because a different view is taken in proceedings under a separate direct tax enactment. The reopening made under section 59(b) of the Estate Duty Act was therefore founded on an impermissible disregard of a valid and subsisting partition order.
Conclusion: The order under section 171(3) remained binding and effective, and the reopening and fresh assessment under the Estate Duty Act were not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial order under section 171(3) recognising a Hindu family partition is binding in proceedings under other direct tax laws until it is fully set aside by a competent authority, and it cannot be ignored collaterally for reopening assessment.