Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 8 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, expenditure exceeding the interest income from securities could be allowed so as to create a negative income or loss.
Analysis: Section 8 imposes tax on interest receivable from securities and its proviso permits deduction only of a reasonable sum expended for realising such interest and of interest payable on borrowed money used for investment in the securities. The language of the proviso links the allowance to the existence of interest income, and the deduction for realisation expenses is confined to cases where interest is actually realised. The different phraseology used in section 8, as compared with other charging heads and allowance provisions in the Act, indicates that the head 'interest on securities' was intended to operate distinctly and does not authorise the creation of a loss by setting off borrowed interest against non-existent receipts. The later form of section 19 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not treated as declaratory of section 8.
Conclusion: Negative income or loss could not be allowed under section 8; the question was answered in the negative and the decision was against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 8 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, deductions for interest on borrowed funds are permissible only against actual interest income from securities and cannot create a negative income or loss.