Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains tax was leviable on the sale of the insolvent's property by the Official Receiver, having regard to the vesting of the property in the Official Receiver under insolvency law and the absence of any cost of acquisition in his hands.
Analysis: On adjudication of insolvency, the insolvent's property vested in the Official Receiver by operation of law and the insolvent ceased to have any rights, title or interest in it. The Official Receiver held the property only for administration and distribution among creditors and, when he sold the property, he did so in discharge of statutory duties rather than as an owner acquiring and transferring an asset at a cost. In such a situation, the computation machinery for capital gains could not be applied, because no cost of acquisition could be conceived in the hands of the Official Receiver. The provisions governing transfer of property on vesting and the representative-assessee provisions were held inapplicable on these facts.
Conclusion: Capital gains tax was not leviable in the hands of the Official Receiver on the sale of the insolvent's property, and the assessment to that extent was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where property vests in an Official Receiver by operation of insolvency law and the Receiver sells it only as statutory custodian without any cost of acquisition in his hands, the capital gains charging and computation provisions do not apply.