Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the wealth-tax assessments made on the assessee, an HUF governed by the Dayabhaga school, were valid when the properties inherited by the heirs of a Hindu male were not jointly assessable in the status of an HUF.
Analysis: The governing principle applied was that, on the death of a Hindu male governed by the Dayabhaga school, the heirs take defined shares in the property. The coparcenary has unity of possession but not unity of ownership, so each heir is owner of his or her share. Such shares are liable, if at all, to be assessed in individual hands under Section 3 of the Wealth-tax Act, not as joint wealth of an HUF.
Conclusion: The assessments on the HUF were illegal and void and were cancelled.