Tribunal Rules Interest on Fixed Deposits Not Exempt u/s 10B Due to Lack of Nexus with Export Activities.

The Tribunal determined that the assessee was not entitled to exemption u/s 10B for interest income on fixed deposits, as such income did not have a direct nexus with the Export Oriented Unit's activities and was classified as "Business Income." The Tribunal also held that interest paid on loans against FDRs could not be set off due to a lack of direct nexus, referencing a Supreme Court judgment. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further adjudication in line with the Tribunal's guidance.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to exemption u/s 10B for interest income on fixed deposits.
2. Classification of interest income as "Income from Other Sources" or "Business Income".
3. Allowability of set-off of interest paid on loans against interest income on FDRs.

Summary:

Entitlement to Exemption u/s 10B:
The primary issue was whether the assessee was entitled to exemption u/s 10B for interest income of Rs. 18,77,170 on fixed deposits. The Tribunal held that the expression "any profits and gains" in section 10B does not include income assessable under the head "Income from Other Sources". The interest income must have a direct and proximate relationship with the activities of the Export Oriented Unit to qualify for exemption. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the contention that interest income, even if assessable under "Income from Other Sources", would be exempt u/s 10B.

Classification of Interest Income:
The assessee argued that the interest income should be classified as "Business Income" since the FDRs were made out of borrowed funds (Packing Credit Limit) and not surplus funds. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, noting that there was no evidence to suggest the FDRs were made from surplus funds. The interest income was thus attributable to the business activity and assessable as business income.

Set-off of Interest Paid:
The assessee contended that if the interest income is assessed as business income, the interest paid on loans against the FDRs should be set off against such income. The Tribunal acknowledged the principle that only net income should be excluded if interest is paid for earning such income. However, it referred to the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Gopinathan, which held that interest paid on loans against FDRs could not be set off against interest income on FDRs due to the lack of direct nexus. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify if the FDRs were made from interest-bearing borrowed funds and allow set-off accordingly.

Conclusion:
The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication based on the Tribunal's guidance.

---