Tribunal directs inclusion of interest income & insurance claims in deduction computation

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to include interest income, subsidy, and insurance claims in profits for computing deduction under Section 10B. Additionally, the Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO to reassess the exclusion of DEPB benefits in accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment in Topman Exports for computing deduction under Section 80HHC.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Exclusion of interest income, subsidy, and insurance claims from profits for computing deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
2. Exclusion of benefit under the Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) Scheme while computing deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act.

Summary:

Issue 1: Exclusion of Interest Income, Subsidy, and Insurance Claims from Profits for Computing Deduction under Section 10B

The assessee, engaged in the manufacture and sale of rice, contested the exclusion of interest income, subsidy, and insurance claims from profits for computing deduction under Section 10B. The Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) held that the interest income of Rs. 19,24,528/-, subsidy of Rs. 81,000/-, and insurance claims of Rs. 19,50,000/- were not derived from the industrial undertaking and thus not eligible for deduction under Section 10B. The Tribunal, however, held that all income arising during the course of running the eligible business qualifies for deduction under Section 10B, citing various judicial precedents including CIT vs. Koshika Telecom Ltd., CIT vs. Hritnik Exports Pvt. Ltd., and the Full Bench decision of the Karnataka High Court in Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd. The Tribunal directed the AO to include the interest income, subsidy, and insurance claims in the profits eligible for deduction under Section 10B.

Issue 2: Exclusion of Benefit under DEPB Scheme while Computing Deduction under Section 80HHC

The AO excluded the benefit under the DEPB Scheme from the profits for computing deduction under Section 80HHC, as the assessee failed to provide evidence that the rate of drawback credit attributable to customs duty was higher than the rate of credit under the DEPB scheme. The Tribunal, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Topman Exports vs. CIT, held that only the profit earned from the sale of DEPB credits, excluding the face value of the DEPB, should be excluded for computing deduction under Section 80HHC. The matter was remanded back to the AO to decide afresh in light of this judgment.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to include the interest income, subsidy, and insurance claims in the profits for computing deduction under Section 10B and to reassess the exclusion of DEPB benefits in accordance with the Supreme Court's judgment in Topman Exports.

---