Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reimbursement of salaries paid to deputed staff of group hotels was liable to tax deduction at source as fees for professional or technical services under section 194J, and whether interest under section 201(1A) could be levied for non-deduction.
Analysis: The payment in question was found to be reimbursement of actual salaries of employees deputed from the group hotels. The deputed personnel were not carrying on an independent profession and were not rendering fees-based professional services to the assessee; they were performing duties as employees under their own employers. The amount reimbursed was salary and not consideration for technical consultancy. The definition of fees for technical services also excludes consideration that is income chargeable under the head salaries. The agreement separately provided for technical consultancy fees and for reimbursement of expenses, showing that the salary reimbursements were distinct from service fees. Since the deputed employees had already been taxed on their salary income, no further demand could be sustained against the assessee on the same payment.
Conclusion: The assessee was not liable to deduct tax at source under section 194J on the reimbursement of salaries, and the demand under section 201 and the interest under section 201(1A) were unsustainable.