Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest charged under section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be reduced for the period during which the recipient of the interest had already paid advance tax on the same income, so as to treat the payer as having substantially complied with the tax deduction obligation.
Analysis: Chapter XVII of the Income-tax Act, 1961 provides the scheme for collection and recovery of tax at source. The obligation to deduct tax under sections such as 194A is a mode of recovery of the recipient's tax liability, and sections 198 and 199 treat the deducted amount as income of, and payment on behalf of, the payee. The interest under section 201(1A) is compensatory and is intended to make good deprivation of tax to the Government. Where the payee has already paid advance tax on the same income, the tax liability to that extent stands discharged and there is no justification for charging interest for the corresponding period, since no real loss to the Revenue remains and double recovery would result in unjust enrichment.
Conclusion: The reduction of interest was justified and the Revenue's challenge failed.