TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 54,000 received by the assessee under the property transaction was taxable as income, either as capital gain or as profit from an adventure in the nature of trade.
Analysis: The receipt was found to arise from the assessee's surrender of his possessory and tenancy-related position in the property transaction, and not from any transfer of a capital asset held by him so as to attract capital gains. It was also held that the arrangement to purchase the property did not create any interest in immovable property in favour of the assessee, and therefore no transfer of a capital asset within the charging provisions could arise on the facts. On the separate reasoning adopted by the concurring member, the amount was treated as an advance received under an incomplete transaction, the final sale having been completed later, and the receipt was not shown to have accrued as income in the relevant year.
Conclusion: The amount of Rs. 54,000 was not taxable in the assessee's hands for the year under appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: A mere agreement to purchase immovable property does not, by itself, create an interest in the property; in the absence of a taxable transfer or completed accrual in the relevant year, the receipt cannot be assessed as income or capital gain.
TaxTMI 
