Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1984 (10) TMI 98 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Fresh Investigation Ordered on Rs. 2.70 Lakh Donations Assessability The Tribunal ordered a fresh investigation to determine whether donations totaling Rs. 2.70 lakhs were actually received by the assessee-trust, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Fresh Investigation Ordered on Rs. 2.70 Lakh Donations Assessability

                            The Tribunal ordered a fresh investigation to determine whether donations totaling Rs. 2.70 lakhs were actually received by the assessee-trust, emphasizing the need to examine the accounts of donors and the recipient college. The Tribunal departed from its earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78 due to new factual data, allowing the revenue's appeal for further scrutiny. The donations' assessability as income hinged on actual receipt, warranting a comprehensive probe into the transactions.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Whether the entries in the assessee-trust's account books debiting the donors with the amount of donations and crediting the amounts to the account of Atma Ram Sanatan Dharam College amounted to receipt of donations when the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting.
                            2. Whether the Tribunal was bound to follow its own earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78.
                            3. Whether Rs. 2.70 lakhs was assessable as income in the hands of the assessee-trust for the assessment year under appeal.

                            Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Receipt of Donations and Method of Accounting:
                            The primary issue was whether the entries in the assessee-trust's account books debiting the donors with the amount of donations and crediting the amounts to the account of Atma Ram Sanatan Dharam College amounted to receipt of donations when the assessee was following the mercantile system of accounting. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) observed that the assessee had credited the donations of Rs. 2.70 lakhs as income in its books, thus treating it as received under the mercantile system. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the assessee's contention that the donations were not actually received and thus should not be considered income. The Tribunal, however, noted that the factual position required further examination, particularly the accounts of the donors and the recipient college to determine if the funds were actually received. The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the ITO for a thorough investigation to determine whether the donations were received and constituted the income of the assessee-trust.

                            2. Binding Nature of Earlier Tribunal Order:
                            The second issue was whether the Tribunal was bound to follow its own earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78. The Judicial Member argued that the facts of the case had not changed from the previous year, and thus the Tribunal should follow its earlier order, which had ruled in favor of the assessee. However, the Accountant Member noted new factual data for the assessment year 1978-79 that was not available in the earlier year, justifying a different approach. The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member, stating that while the principle of res judicata does not strictly apply to tax proceedings, the Tribunal should not depart from its earlier findings without cogent reasons. However, new material facts justified a fresh investigation.

                            3. Assessability of Rs. 2.70 Lakhs as Income:
                            The third issue was whether the amount of Rs. 2.70 lakhs was assessable as income in the hands of the assessee-trust for the assessment year under appeal. The ITO had treated the entire amount as taxable income, while the Commissioner (Appeals) had deleted this addition. The Judicial Member held that donations 'receivable' could not be treated as income, emphasizing that the substance of the matter was that the donations had not been received. The Accountant Member, however, pointed out that the donations were credited in the books and suggested that the accounts of both donors and the recipient college should be examined to determine the actual receipt of funds. The Third Member agreed with the Accountant Member's approach, noting that a thorough investigation was necessary to establish whether the donations were received and thus assessable as income.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal decided to restore the matter to the file of the ITO for fresh investigation and decision, emphasizing the need to examine the accounts of the donors and the recipient college to determine the actual receipt of the donations. This decision was based on the new factual data available for the assessment year 1978-79, which justified a departure from the Tribunal's earlier order for the assessment year 1977-78. The appeal by the revenue was thus deemed to be allowed for further examination.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found