Tribunal grants relief, directs deletion of disallowed interest under section 43B

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, sustaining an addition of Rs. 7,50,000 for higher consumption of rice husk, granting relief of Rs. 42,04,635, and directing deletion of the disallowed interest under section 43B. The disallowances of club expenses and commission were rejected as they were not pressed before the CIT(A). The Tribunal instructed the CIT(A) to decide on the issue of investment allowance.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Reopening of assessment under section 147.
2. Addition of Rs. 52,54,635 on account of bogus purchase of rice husk.
3. Disallowance of club expenses amounting to Rs. 50,000.
4. Disallowance of commission amounting to Rs. 31,025 paid to M/s Shiv Dairy.
5. Disallowance of interest amounting to Rs. 56,53,161 under section 43B.
6. Claim of investment allowance amounting to Rs. 70,41,166.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147:
The learned counsel of the assessee did not press for the grounds relating to reopening of assessment under section 147. Accordingly, these grounds need no adjudication and are rejected.

2. Addition of Rs. 52,54,635 on Account of Bogus Purchase of Rice Husk:
The substantive issue raised was against confirming an addition of Rs. 52,54,635 on account of bogus purchase of rice husk from Shri Balwant Singh. The assessee-company was running a milk plant and used rice husk for generating steam. A search revealed purchases from Shri Balwant Singh, who supplied rice husk through his proprietary concern M/s Nanak Suppliers.

The AO was not convinced about the genuineness of the transaction due to various reasons, including the lack of business transactions by Shri Balwant Singh with other parties, the immediate withdrawal of amounts, and the higher consumption of rice husk compared to other years. The AO concluded that the purchases shown from Shri Balwant Singh were not genuine and disallowed the purchase amount.

On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, noting that the entire amount was withdrawn from the bank account within four days of deposit and that the consumption of rice husk was excessive compared to other years. The CIT(A) also observed that Balwant Singh had no prior or subsequent business transactions and was assessed only once at a nominal figure.

The Tribunal, however, found that the assessee maintained regular books of account audited by a reputed firm, and there was no adverse comment on the books. The Tribunal noted that the rice husk was transported to the factory premises through trucks, and the Revenue did not prove otherwise. The Tribunal also considered statements from various individuals, including Shri Balwant Singh, Shri S.K. Aggarwal, and Shri V.K. Kaushal, which supported the assessee's claim. The Tribunal concluded that the rice husk was genuinely purchased and received by the assessee-company, and there was no justification for disallowing the entire purchase amount. However, considering the higher consumption rate, the Tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 7,50,000 and granted relief of Rs. 42,04,635.

3. Disallowance of Club Expenses Amounting to Rs. 50,000:
The AO made a disallowance of club expenses amounting to Rs. 50,000. The assessee did not press this ground before the CIT(A), and it was rejected. The learned counsel of the assessee failed to provide justification for agitating the ground before the Tribunal when it was not pressed before the CIT(A). The ground is accordingly rejected.

4. Disallowance of Commission Amounting to Rs. 31,025 Paid to M/s Shiv Dairy:
Similar to the club expenses, the AO made a disallowance of commission amounting to Rs. 31,025 paid to M/s Shiv Dairy. The assessee did not press this ground before the CIT(A), and it was rejected. The learned counsel of the assessee failed to provide justification for agitating the ground before the Tribunal when it was not pressed before the CIT(A). The ground is accordingly rejected.

5. Disallowance of Interest Amounting to Rs. 56,53,161 Under Section 43B:
The AO disallowed interest amounting to Rs. 56,53,161 under section 43B, noting that the interest accrued but not due on deferred payment credit obtained from IDBI was not paid. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, referring to an earlier appellate order for the assessment year 1991-92.

The learned counsel of the assessee argued that the provisions of section 43B were not applicable as no interest was payable to any financial institution during the year. The assessee had no arrangement with IDBI, and the interest was provided in the books on an accrual basis. The Tribunal found that the assessee had no direct financial arrangement with IDBI, and the interest was not payable to IDBI. The Tribunal also noted that the CIT(A) for the assessment year 1990-91 had deleted a similar disallowance, and the Revenue had accepted that finding. The Tribunal concluded that there was no merit in the disallowance and directed its deletion.

6. Claim of Investment Allowance Amounting to Rs. 70,41,166:
The assessee raised a ground relating to the grant of investment allowance before the CIT(A), but the CIT(A) did not discuss or adjudicate upon the issue. The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to decide the issue after affording due opportunity of being heard.

Conclusion:
The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed. The Tribunal sustained an addition of Rs. 7,50,000 on account of higher consumption of rice husk, granted relief of Rs. 42,04,635, and directed the deletion of the disallowance of interest under section 43B. The issues of club expenses and commission were rejected as they were not pressed before the CIT(A). The Tribunal also directed the CIT(A) to adjudicate the issue of investment allowance.

---