Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods cleared under the brand name "AIDEES NEWALL" were cleared under the brand name of another person so as to attract the bar in para 4 of Notification No. 1/93-C.E. dated 28-2-93 and deny Small Scale Exemption.
Analysis: The brand name "NEWALL" admittedly belonged to the respondents' collaborators, and the respondents added their own word to it. Under Explanation IX to Notification No. 1/93-C.E. dated 28-2-93, a brand name includes any name or mark used so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade with another person. The altered expression "AIDEES NEWALL" still retained the pre-existing brand element "NEWALL" and therefore continued to indicate a trade connection with the owner of that brand name. On that basis, the branded clearances fell within the embargo created by para 4 of the notification.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to Small Scale Exemption on the disputed clearances, and the duty demand and penalty were sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal succeeded because the branded goods were held to have been cleared under another person's brand name, disqualifying the clearances from SSI benefit.
Ratio Decidendi: A modified mark that retains the essential brand element of another person and still indicates a connection in the course of trade falls within the mischief of the SSI notification's brand-name bar.