Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation on the mini truck and car was allowable to the assessee despite the vehicles not being transferred in the assessee's name in the transport records.
Analysis: The assets were purchased for consideration as part of a going concern and were used for the assessee's business. The distinction between immovable property and movable property was material: for movable assets, title passes on sale and delivery, and registration in the transferee's name is not a condition for passing ownership. The provisions dealing with transfer intimation under the motor vehicle law were treated as regulatory and consequential, not as provisions affecting title. The authorities cited by the Revenue, which concerned immovable property, were held inapplicable, while the decisions supporting depreciation on purchased motor vehicles were followed.
Conclusion: Depreciation was rightly allowed, and the assessee was held to be the owner of the vehicles for this purpose.