Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income received by the guarantors under the guarantee agreements constituted agricultural income exempt from tax.
Analysis: The land involved was agricultural land and the farming activity included cultivation, harvesting, and sale of produce. The guarantors were not mere recipients of a contractual payment; on the facts found by the appellate authority and accepted by the majority, they were actively associated with the farming operations, pooled resources and skill, and participated in the coordinated management of the farms. Agricultural income does not require ownership of land in every case, and what matters is the real source and character of the receipt. Since the guarantee arrangement operated as a modification of the earlier farming arrangement and the income continued to spring directly from agricultural operations on land used for agricultural purposes, the contractual form did not change its essential character.
Conclusion: The income received by the guarantors was agricultural income and remained exempt from tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where guarantors are directly associated with agricultural operations on agricultural land and the receipt arises as a share of the agricultural produce or profits from such operations, the income retains its character as agricultural income despite the presence of a guarantee agreement.