Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received by the assessee in his character as shebait, being remuneration calculated as a share of the trust income, was exempt from income-tax as agricultural income.
Analysis: The trust income derived from agricultural lands was agricultural income in the hands of the trustee, but the amount paid to the assessee as remuneration arose from the covenant in the deed of trust conferring a right to compensation for management. The assessee had no beneficial interest in the trust properties and did not receive the amount as rent or revenue derived from land used for agricultural purposes. The source from which the remuneration arose and the character in which it was received were altered when the trust income was appropriated for personal remuneration, even though the remuneration was computed by reference to agricultural income.
Conclusion: The amount received as shebait remuneration was not exempt agricultural income and was taxable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed, and the assessee was not entitled to exemption in respect of the remuneration received from the trust.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment received under a contractual covenant for management is not agricultural income merely because it is quantified by reference to agricultural receipts; exemption applies only where the receipt itself retains the character of rent or revenue derived from agricultural land.