Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's contribution to the road development fund for improving roads used to transport sugarcane to its factories was capital expenditure or revenue expenditure deductible in computing business income.
Analysis: Expenditure incurred in the course of carrying on a business is capital only if it brings into existence an asset or advantage of an enduring nature for the business. Where the outlay is made for running the business efficiently and profitably, and no enduring asset or benefit accrues to the assessee, it is revenue expenditure. The roads remained Government property, the assessee did not acquire them, and the payment was made to facilitate transport of raw material and the day-to-day conduct of the sugar business. The expenditure was thus dictated by commercial expediency and was not for bringing into existence an enduring capital asset for the assessee.
Conclusion: The expenditure was revenue in nature and was allowable as a deduction; the disallowance was incorrect and the answer to the reference was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made for commercial expediency to facilitate the efficient running of a business, without bringing into existence an asset or enduring advantage for the assessee, is revenue expenditure and is deductible.