Accrued liability and revalued asset depreciation allowed, while voluntary donations failed business-expense test

An accrued audit fee liability under mercantile accounting was treated as an ascertained obligation, so the deduction was allowed. Depreciation on machinery taken over from a dissolved firm was allowed on the enhanced revalued cost, consistent with the position accepted for an earlier year. Voluntary donations to hospital and school welfare committees were held not to qualify as business expenditure for lack of direct business nexus, though deduction under section 80G could still be examined on proof and verification. Directors' remuneration was allowed on the same basis accepted in the earlier year. Payment to the group gratuity insurance scheme and the investment allowance claim were also upheld.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the audit fee liability, being an ascertained liability under the mercantile system, was deductible; (ii) whether depreciation was allowable on the enhanced value of machinery taken over from the erstwhile firm; (iii) whether the donations to the hospital and school welfare committees were deductible as business expenditure or, alternatively, under section 80G; (iv) whether the disallowance of directors' remuneration was justified; (v) whether the payment to the group gratuity insurance scheme and the claim for investment allowance were allowable.

Issue (i): Whether the audit fee liability, being an ascertained liability under the mercantile system, was deductible.

Analysis: The liability for audit fees had accrued during the relevant previous year and was consistently provided for in the accounts. It was treated as an accrued and ascertained obligation, and not as a mere contingent provision.

Conclusion: The deduction was allowable in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether depreciation was allowable on the enhanced value of machinery taken over from the erstwhile firm.

Analysis: The assets were taken over on revalued figures pursuant to the dissolution of the earlier firm. The same controversy had already been decided in the assessee's favour for an earlier year on the basis that the enhanced cost at which the assets were allotted could form the basis for depreciation.

Conclusion: Depreciation on the enhanced value was allowable in favour of the assessee.

Issue (iii): Whether the donations to the hospital and school welfare committees were deductible as business expenditure or, alternatively, under section 80G.

Analysis: The payments were voluntary donations motivated by humanitarian considerations and did not have a direct nexus with the business operations. They were not shown to be a precondition for carrying on the business, nor linked to any statutory permit, licence, or business necessity. The claim could not be allowed as business expenditure under section 37(1). At the same time, the claim remained open for consideration under section 80G subject to proof and verification of receipts.

Conclusion: The claim was rejected under section 37(1), but deduction under section 80G was left to be allowed in accordance with law after verification, in favour of the assessee to that extent.

Issue (iv): Whether the disallowance of directors' remuneration was justified.

Analysis: The allowance of the remuneration had already been upheld for the earlier year, and the same basis governed the present year. No reason was found to depart from the earlier view.

Conclusion: The disallowance was not justified and the claim was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Issue (v): Whether the payment to the group gratuity insurance scheme and the claim for investment allowance were allowable.

Analysis: The gratuity fund had received approval with retrospective effect from 1 June 1985, removing the foundation of the disallowance. The investment allowance claim was also covered by the legal position already affirmed in relation to the assessee's line of business.

Conclusion: Both claims were upheld in favour of the assessee and the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the principal monetary claims, while the Revenue's objections were rejected. The matter ended with relief in part to the assessee and no relief to the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: An accrued liability under mercantile accounting is deductible when it is ascertained, a voluntary donation without business nexus is not deductible under section 37(1), and a payment may be considered under section 80G only if the statutory conditions are satisfied.

---