Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1981 (2) TMI 120 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, overturns additions and disallowances by tax authorities. The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the additions and disallowances made by the ITO and sustained ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, overturns additions and disallowances by tax authorities.

                              The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the additions and disallowances made by the ITO and sustained by the AAC.




                              Issues Involved:

                              1. Addition of Rs. 2,20,000 as inflation in purchase and deletion of Rs. 1,90,000 by the AAC.
                              2. Application of Section 144B procedures and assessment limitation.
                              3. Disallowance of Rs. 6,000 salary to Anandan.
                              4. Disallowance of provision for wages payable as on 31st March, 1974, amounting to Rs. 46,980.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Addition of Rs. 2,20,000 as inflation in purchase and deletion of Rs. 1,90,000 by the AAC:

                              The primary issue in this case was the addition of Rs. 2,20,000 by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) as inflation in purchase costs, which was later reduced by Rs. 1,90,000 by the Assistant Appellate Commissioner (AAC). The assessee, a cashew exporter, claimed processing charges of Rs. 6,72,001.50 for cashew processed by outsiders. However, discrepancies were found in the day book and ledger, particularly concerning the number of bags processed and the rate per bag. The ITO estimated the outside processing costs at Rs. 4,39,538, leading to an addition of Rs. 2,20,000 after allowing Rs. 12,000 for some work done by outside factories. The AAC, however, found Rs. 32.50 per bag reasonable and reduced the addition to Rs. 30,000. The Tribunal noted that the ITO accepted the total figure of 19,979 bags processed and the payment of Rs. 1,32,330 to Suresh Babu. The Tribunal found no conclusive evidence that the initial entry of 6015 bags processed by Suresh Babu was correct and accepted the assessee's claim of 4010 bags. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the entire addition, finding the rate of Rs. 33 per bag reasonable.

                              2. Application of Section 144B procedures and assessment limitation:

                              The assessee argued that Section 144B proceedings do not apply to the assessment year 1974-75, and hence the assessment was barred by limitation. The Tribunal noted that Section 144B is procedural and applies to all returns pending as of the commencement date. The return was filed on 8th June 1976, and the normal period of limitation expired on 8th June 1977. The assessment order was passed on 21st September 1977. The ITO did not make the additions in the draft assessment but did so under the directions of the IAC under Section 144A. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that the additions should have been made before 8th June 1977 and were thus barred by limitation. The Tribunal rejected the argument that the extended period for concealment applied, as the ITO did not indicate that the assessment was being made under the extended period for concealment.

                              3. Disallowance of Rs. 6,000 salary to Anandan:

                              The ITO disallowed Rs. 6,000 shown as payable to Anandan on 31st March 1974, based on a sworn statement from Anandan denying receipt of salary. The assessee was not given an opportunity to cross-examine Anandan. The Tribunal found that the disallowance was made on illegal principles, as the opportunity for cross-examination is a fundamental principle of natural justice. Without cross-examination, the deposition was excluded, and there was no material to dispute the genuineness of the liability. The Tribunal canceled the disallowance of Rs. 6,000.

                              4. Disallowance of provision for wages payable as on 31st March, 1974, amounting to Rs. 46,980:

                              The ITO proposed disallowance of Rs. 46,980, reasoning that the liability to pay this amount had not been proved, as the processing season ended by December 1973. The AAC confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal found no reason to doubt the genuineness of the liability, noting that some wages for the last week of March were paid in the first week of April, indicating that the factory operated in March 1974. The Tribunal found the provision for wages genuine and deleted the addition.

                              Conclusion:

                              The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the additions and disallowances made by the ITO and sustained by the AAC.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found